Head graphene radical s tennis racquet review

  • 10.04.2019
  • Tennis

head graphene radical s tennis racquet review

Factor in the easy access to power, and this racquet truly became a force to be reckoned with. Overall, the Graphene + Radical MP impressed our team, proving. The racquet is extremely maneuverable, has solid control and a soft feel. Players who enjoy a light racquet and a soft feel will love this racquet. The racquet. The Head Radical MP is notably stiffer than most rackets but it is still comfortable. I like this as I enjoy feeling the ball on my strings. I feel it helps my.

Understood not: Head graphene radical s tennis racquet review

SHOOTING IN BELDING MICHIGAN
SILENCER GOLF BAG
Nebraska baseball uniforms 2020

Head graphene radical s tennis racquet review - And have

Head Graphene Radical S Racket Review

Head has revamped the Radical range with their Graphene technology and a great new paint job so we thought we’d get the Head Graphene Radical S out to put it through its paces.

My cousin, who’s a developing player recently bought this racket and loves everything about it, so I thought it was time to find out what the fuss is about!

Although I’ve never used the Radical range myself, I would have to say it’s one of the most consistent racket ranges out there.

You know what you’re going to get with these rackets, and they always offer a nice balance between power, spin, and control.

The updated Radical S brings Graphene technology to this racket and should address one of the weaker areas of the Radical rackets &#; comfort.

Graphene reinforces the frame to add a little bit more stability and comfort on contact, which should make playing with this racket a bit more comfortable.

In the past, comfort would probably have been the one area where I would have some criticism of the Radical rackets, so I’m hopeful that the new technology will see big improvements in this area.

Specs wise, the Graphene Radical S looks ideal for developing players, with a manageable g unstrung weight and a forgiving sq inch head.

All the Radical rackets tend to be pretty maneuverable but with its headlight balance, the Radical S should encourage some seriously speedy shots.

This leads me to believe that the Head Graphene Radical S should be looking to compete with rackets like the Wilson Blade 98L, the Prince Textreme Beast and the Babolat Pure Strike Team.

All of these rackets offer a nice set up for developing players, and a good balance between spin, power, and control that should really help players looking to play an all-round game.

Like these other rackets, I think the Head Graphene Radical S is nicely set up for a wide range of players, from juniors to intermediate adults, all the way through to senior players.

That’s because the Radical S promises lightweight maneuverability with solid performance, ideal for those players who don’t want a heavy racket.

We often get asked what kind of string set up we use for our playtests, so I’ll let you know what we used for our Graphene Radical S review and the thinking behind it.

I always lean towards control, and since the Radical S is a much lighter racket than I would normally use, I went for a very control oriented setup of Big Banger Original at 54 lbs.

Now, this setup is certainly not for everyone, so if you want a little advice on how to set up your new racket then check out Tom’s Tennis String Tension Guide.

I pretty much always say this, but I was especially excited for this playtest as I was interested to see just what it was that sold this racket to my cousin.

I was hopeful that it would be great performance rather than just a bit of a sales pitch!

Every shot is important, but certainly, in today’s game, groundstrokes are your bread and butter shots.

If you’re not comfortable hitting groundstrokes with your racket then you need a new racket, simple as that.

Otherwise, you’ll just see your performance drop and the injuries build up.

The good news is that racket companies have been making huge strides in racket comfort, and we can see that with Head’s Graphene technology.

This upgrade has gone really nicely into the Radical S and I must say, it is so easy to use.

It swings so naturally but yet, has surprising stability on contact given its weight.

You don’t get too many harsh vibrations from this stick but you also don’t have to sacrifice greatly on performance.

If you’re a beginner or intermediate then this is great news!

Of the rackets I mentioned earlier, I found the Radical S to be most similar to the Babolat Pure Strike Team, but I must admit, I found the Radical easier to use.

The sq inch head is more user-friendly and offers a little bit more easy power, which for me made this racket an excellent intermediate’s racket.

The Radical doesn’t quite have the same levels of performance as the Wilson Blade 98L in my opinion, but I did find it to be much more forgiving.

The Wilson’s 98 sq inch head is slightly more difficult to play with, but in return, you do get better control.

Like any racket, it’s really a question of what you’re looking for, and if you want easy playability with good performance then this Head Graphene Radical S is a brilliant option.

Personally, as a slightly more experienced player, I would choose the Wilson Blade 98L out of all of these because of its excellent performance levels.

However, the Blade 98L is my highest ranked racket under g and the Head Graphene Radical S certainly isn’t far behind it.

If it’s easy playability you’re looking for then take a look at this racket!

I’ve given the Head Graphene Radical S a 7 out of 10 on the groundstrokes.

For a developing player, one of the most important qualities from a racket at the net is easy maneuverability. You want to be able to get your racket into position nice and quickly, ready to block the ball back.

As we’ve already found out, the Head Graphene Radical S has excellent maneuverability, so that makes it easy to volley with.

Because of its weight, the Radical S isn’t going to have the kind of stability that is necessary for volleying at the highest level, but you don’t need that as a developing player.

You just need something that you find easy to work with and will be able to control the ball enough to give you a solid base.

I found that the Radical S did exactly that, and proved itself to be a great racket for developing players once more.

The other thing I greatly appreciated with this racket was the comfort levels.

As I’ve said before, this was an area I always had concerns with when it came to Radical rackets.

I don’t know if it was just me but I found them a little bit stiff.

That has changed with the Head Graphene Radical S though and you can really notice it when you’re volleying.

Again, compared to the other three rackets, I would say that the Wilson Blade 98L offers the best performance levels at the net, but when it comes to playability I would choose the Radical S.

It’s delightfully easy to play with and you don’t have to sacrifice much on performance.

I enjoyed playing with the Head Graphene Radical S at the net, and gave it a very solid 7 out of 10 for its performance.

I find the serve to be the most difficult balancing act for a racket. I want maneuverability but I also want stability and it’s not often you get the perfect blend of both.

For me, the Radical S just leaned a little bit too much towards maneuverability and I did lose a little bit of performance on serve.

That’s not to say the balance of this racket is wrong for everyone though, and I think that for the majority of developing players, maneuverability would be more important than stability on serve.

This is because the serve is a very complex shot that’s difficult to perfect so it’s much easier to have a racket that you’re comfortable getting into position.

If you can begin to maximize your racket head speed on the serve then you can really start to increase the power you get on the shot.

The speed of the Radical S and it’s easy playability allow you to do this and that’s one aspect I particularly like about this racket &#; it encourages you to improve.

As you develop into a more advanced player then you might find it’s time to move to a slightly heavier racket, but while you’re still perfecting the serve, the Radical S is a very good racket.

I gave the Head Graphene Radical S a out of 10 on the serve, its lowest score of the playtest.

This isn’t a bad score, especially for a g racket, it’s just the one area where I missed the extra stability of a heavier racket.

Overall, I was very impressed with the improvements these rackets have made with the introduction of Graphene technology.

The Head Graphene Radical S is now an extremely maneuverable racket that’s very comfortable to play with.

The best part is that it does this without sacrificing too much on performance.

I found the Radical S performed particularly well from the back of the court, where its easy playability makes it ideal for beginner and intermediate players.

There’s a tendency for light rackets to be a bit flimsy and lack performance, but I certainly didn’t get that feeling from this stick.

If it’s maneuverability you’re after then you certainly won’t be disappointed with the Head’s groundstroke performance.

At net, the easy nature of this racket continues, and developing players are bound to benefit from this.

You’ve got to feel confident that you can get into position quickly when you’re at the net, and you can’t fail to do that with the Radical S.

Of course, at g it’s never going to have massive stability, but as long as you’re not playing at too high of a level this shouldn’t be a problem.

On a personal note, I found the weakest part of this playtest to be on the serve.

I found I was craving more stability and thus the ability to inject more power into the shot.

This is a personal preference though, and I do think developing players will be more concerned with maneuverability than stability.

If that’s the case then you won’t be disappointed with the Radical S.

All in all, I would say this was an excellent playtest.

The Head Graphene Radical S is a racket that I would recommend to any developing player who wants a racket that is highly maneuverable and comfortable.

I gave the Radical S a solid 7 out of

Is This Racket Right For Your Game? Find Out With a Custom Fitting!

Discover Your Excalibur!

Groundstrokes

7

out of 10

Get the Head Graphene Radical S Racket for the Best Price from RacquetGuys!

Buy Now
Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

After my tennis friend and racquet junkie, Henrik Wallensten, reviewed the new HEAD Graphene Radical MP favorably, I was, of course, very curious about the Pro version. So here is my HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review.

I did enjoy the updates both to the Extreme and Speed Pro racquets and I think HEAD Graphene technology is an improvement over the Graphene Touch generation. Why? Well, I think they have managed to find a solid connection to the string bed. I really know where I will hit my shot with all the Graphene racquets I&#;ve tried and that is a good thing. The &#;hollow feel&#; does bother me a bit with these frames but after finding a good setup with string and tension, I am quite positive about this racquet. Find out the pros and cons in this HEAD Graphene Radical Pro racquet review by reading on&#;

So what is Graphene ? Well, as Henrik mentioned in his Graphene Radical MP review, HEAD have placed graphene in the shaft and in the head at 9, 12 and 3 (clockwise). This creates a more solid feel without adding weight to the frame. The idea is to make the racquet easy and fast to swing, but still solid when it comes to blocking back shots. If I would compare it to perhaps my favorite Radical of all time, the IG Radical Pro, this one is crisper and offers a more feedback from the string bed. The downside with the Radical Pro for me was the launch angle, which could send the ball flying at times. This one is definitely more controlled.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Specs

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

The main difference with the HEAD Graphene Radical Pro and the MP is the weight. There are 15 more grams on the Pro and that is why it is 5 mm more head-light. If you want to get a real pro player swing weight, you can replace the grommet for a so-called CAP grommet that covers the whole frame. That along with a leather grip could be an excellent way to get this racquet to play in pro spec.

WEIGHT (UNSTRUNG):  g / oz
STRING PATTERN: 16/19
HEAD SIZE:  cm² / 98 in²
BALANCE: mm
LENGTH: mm / in
BEAM: 20/23/21 mm

I rarely mention design on Tennisnerd, but I want to say that the cosmetics of the Graphene Radical Pro is an improvement over the previous Spiderman-themed racquet. But that is obviously a highly subjective thing.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; How does it play?

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

Finding the right string for a racquet is important. It can completely change the character of the whole frame. At first, I strung it up with one of my go-to strings, HEAD Hawk Touch at 24 kg. I love Hawk Touch in a powerful racquet, but I quickly noticed that the Radical is too low-powered for such a string and tension. I thought the previous edition was quite powerful and this one is much more controlled and it is easier to connect with the ball. But the response with HEAD Hawk Touch felt a bit board-like and racquets that play like that crave a lower tension.

The launch angle of the Radical Pro is not low like an 18&#;20, but definitely lower than many 16&#;19, 98 sq inch racquets I&#;ve tried. That is partly why I thought that Solinco Tour Bite Soft at 22,5 kg would be perfect in this frame. And the string did make the string bed softer, more spin-friendly and since the racquet is low-powered it was just a perfect blend.

I was testing the racquet together with Nikunj Siwach who is a good player (a couple of ATP points to his name) and an excellent coach and he also loved the combination of string and racquet. He actually said that it was the best racquet he has tried in a while and I usually bring a bag of racquets to the court for us to test. So thumbs up from him. You can see him hitting with the racquet in the video review and he was hitting winners left, right and center.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Who is it for?

I struggled a bit with this racquet at first. The feel with the Graphene can be a tad &#;hollow&#; as opposed to the solid feel of a foam-filled racquet. But once I dialed in the string setup and tension, I felt really connected to the ball. I did not really see the need to add any lead tape to the racquet as it was pretty stable in stock form. Perhaps I would add a little bit at 12 to bump up the swing weight, but with a lower tension, I felt the sweet spot really opened up.

This racquet is definitely for more advanced players. If I would put the different Graphene racquets in a skill level chart, I would put the Graphene Extreme as the easiest to use, the Speed as requiring a little bit more and the Radical as racquet for more advanced players. The sweet spot is not huge, but the ball goes where you want it to if you play with proper technique and footwork. Yes, the MP will be easier to use, but the 98 sq inch head size asks a bit more from you than the sq inch Speed, Instinct and Extreme lines. This makes me very curious about the update to the Prestige line. That will definitely be a players racquet!

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Stroke by stroke

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

I think the HEAD Graphene Radical Pro does most things well and nothing stands out. The racquets ask the question of the user. In the right hands, it can be a weapon. In the wrong hands, it can be a touch demanding. I think intermediate to advanced players should give this one a go if they&#;re looking for a solid racquet to work on their tennis with. String it low to open up some more power and spin and you have a really nice racquet on your hands.

If you want a bit more room for customization, the MP might be the way to go, but I felt the Pro did the job without requiring me to add lead tape to it. And if you want more weight, you can always go for the CAP grommets.

Just a few words on the different strokes.

Groundstrokes &#; This racquet puts the ball where you intend it to go. You don&#;t get a lot for free so if you are keen on improving your tennis, this can be a racquet to bring on your journey.

Volleys &#; Not a rock on off-center hits like many heavier frames, but good feel and stability.

Serves &#; I thought the Radical Pro came through the air nicely and gave a nice pop on serves. Not close to the Extreme, but with excellent precision.

Like I wrote above, I liked this racquet from everywhere on the court. It wasn&#;t the best anywhere, but I felt like I was in charge and that is a big plus for me.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Summary

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

HEAD has made a step in the right direction with the Graphene series. I definitely feel these are the best Graphene racquets yet and the Radical Pro is no exception. They have finetuned the feel to be more precise and this is a really versatile racquet in the hands of the right player. On contact, I get nostalgic about the IG Radical series, but this one feels a bit better balanced overall.

With my transition to a semi-western grip, I felt like this racquet could help me groove into my new style of play in a good way. Comparing it to my love affair with the Clash, it is not as easy to use, but when the Clash launches the ball on flatter shots, I could return to this racquet and rely on it a hundred percent. So for advanced players looking for that special connection to the ball, give this one a shot.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Video

***

Do you like Tennisnerd? Please also follow and share our other channels. Every like, share and follow is deeply appreciated! You can now also become a Tennisnerd patron and receive unique content and reviews before everyone else!

Patreon – Support and get VIP content
YouTube – In-depth video reviews and vlog
Instagram – Racquets, racquets, racquets
Twitter
Facebook Page – New content daily
Facebook Group – Join the discussion with other tennis nerds
Amazon Influencer

About tennis racquets
All racquet reviews
Here is a great racquet buying guide to get you started.
What tennis racquet should I buy?
Top tennis racquets to buy right now
The Gear of the Year
The Gear of the Year
The Gear of the Year
Tennis racquets for juniors
Tennis racquets for kids

Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

Head Radical #peoplesracket

The Radical name is an iconic range in tennis and has been since Andre Agassi first used the original way back in the s. Players like Andy Murray, Sloane Stephens and Taylor Fritz have all used the Radical over the years. Diego Schwartzman French Open Semi finalist also uses the Head Radical. Over twenty years later the Head Radical range is still going strong. will see the launch of the Head Radical with a new frame mould.

Head popped a prototype Radical frameset in the post and asked us to carry out a playtest. We have been told its the MP version. The Head Radical MP is normally a standard 98 sq inch but other than that little is known about the new frame. Head never reveal the actual specs of the racket we only know that it is a Radical MP Prototype.

UPDATE Scroll down for the images of the actual colours for the Head Radical

First Thoughts 

The racket was strung with a polyester string (Head Lynx Tour) at 52lbs. String pattern is 16&#;19 which is the same as previous Head Radicals. This Radical is the MP version meaning it comes in at 98sq inch. The frame itself is quite similar to previous frames with a long throat ( well at least it seems that way) and a good size MP head. The design is quite unique. There will be other models in the Radical line up including the Pro Model which is a little heavier and the lighter and junior models. Agassi played with a Head Radical Oversize in his latter career which came in at sq inch. This has not been in production for years.

What does the Head Radical MP play like?

I have play tested many rackets this year but there is a familiarity with the Head Radical. I guess this is an obvious statement to say given that I have played with Head Radicals for nearly 20 years.I noticed the crisp feel off the middle of the strings with this racket. I feel I can hit groundstrokes and get awesome control. The ball goes where I want it to all the time. For me the Radical is just comfortable. After my first hit with the Head Radical I am buzzing. There is a liveliness about the middle of the strings that I just cannot create with anything else.

Flexibility 

I would describe this is quite a stiff racket. Ofcourse there is some flex when under contact with the tennis ball but not much. It feels as if most of my swing is translated into the tennis ball with little being lost. Some rackets now have a very muted feel. They are made from materials which absorb the vibrations from the strings. The Head Radical MP is notably stiffer than most rackets but it is still comfortable. I like this as I enjoy feeling the ball on my strings. I feel it helps my game with control in a big way. Creatively with spin or touch I feel confident with the Radical. I guess its like playing football in bare feet and being able to have that control of the ball with your skin.

Power

The Radical range has been synonymous with control and precision. If you want power perhaps this racket is not for you. I have a long fast swing and find the Radical a great racket to reign in my wayward swings. The beam on this racket would indicate this also. The big is narrow perhaps between 21 and 24mm. With the balance and weight of this racket I was able to swing freely and take big cuts at the ball.

Spin

Many players will be keen to find out does the Radical produce lots of Spin? This Radical is a player&#;s racket, and as such players will fully developed swings will thrive with it. The relatively open 16&#;19 string pattern ensures easy spin production.

Sweet Spot.

The Head Radical MP has a reasonable sweet spot. I am prone to off centre hits and the Radical MP doesn&#;t feel great but what racket does if you go off centre? If I compare this to another Head racket I love; the Head Gravity, the Gravity is a little more forgiving but lacks the precision of the Radical. My forehand drive from the baseline loves this frame, I can really plough through the ball low and hard and can hit all my spots when I need to. The trouble is with my backhand being my weaker side I found that I really had to centre the shot or it just was not as good. This is really a fault of my game rather than the racket as such. I guess the lesson here is work on my backhand to ensure I am middling my backhand every time.

This racket drops in January so no doubt the final racket and colourscheme will be revealed before then. Should you try this racket?

Here&#;s some reasons why you should give the New Head Radical a go.

The new Head Radical MP is a seriously precise frame for players looking for great accuracy on groundstrokes.

Baseliners who need some control will find loads with the Radical.

The racket I trialled was only a demo but does it look awesome? Like seriously is there a better looking racket than this prototype colour scheme? Here&#;s hoping that Head continue the Grey and Orange colour scheme when the racket reaches the shops.

As a Head Radical fan this frame continues the legend. 

Colourway UPDATE

Head have now revealed the Radical Colours

Like this:

LikeLoading

Related Posts

Tags: Head Radical , Head Radical racket review, Head Radical new

Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

Whether playing more offensively or defensively, using topspin or opting for slice, our playtesters thought the Radical MP excelled from the back of the court. Having tested previous generations, Jason appreciated the improvements with this update. He said, "There's a lot to like about the updated Radical MP on groundstrokes. I immediately noticed this racquet's improved feel. The feel wasn’t as muted, so I was able to tell where on the stringbed I was hitting my shots. I thought the racquet was user-friendly, with great access to spin and depth, and the added 5 grams of weight made this version more stable and solid. One of my favorite shots to hit was my backhand slice; I found I could hit a 'dirtier' slice with this racquet versus the previous version or my own racquet."

New to the Radical line, Kristen praised the racquet's performance on her groundstrokes. She said, "This was my first time playtesting the Radical MP, and I enjoyed many aspects of its playability. There was a really nice feel off the stringbed. It was dampened, but not to the point that I'd get lost in it; I still had a good feel and read on my shots. It was super easy to get spin on the ball; it felt effortless off of the stringbed. That made it simple to get balls dipping deep right at the baseline. When defending or counterpunching, I was not only impressed by how well the racquet handled pace, but I also felt that I was getting natural spin on the ball, making my defensive shots that much more effective. It was also easy to drive slices through the court."

Chris felt dialed in regardless of his shot choice. He explained, "I loved the response of this latest Radical MP off the baseline. I felt like I had total command over my targeting. Whether I was hitting a drive shot, looping the ball or floating a slice, I was able to hit my mark with good consistency. My topspin shots had plenty of spin to get the ball to drop nicely inside the lines, and my slice shots had excellent bite to them. I liked the feel of the racquet. The response was solid and stable (surprisingly so for its weight), and it felt very comfortable, yet I also had lots of touch with it. From tip to handle, the Graphene + Radical MP just felt like a very well put-together racquet on every groundstroke. I think Head did a good job of bringing back the feel and stability of past Radicals without losing the easy power and spin from recent versions."

The praise continued from Erik. He added, "I really liked this Radical MP on groundstrokes. It took a little getting used to at first, but once I dialed it in, this racquet was really solid off of the ground. I could get nice plow through and hit a really heavy ball with a lot of spin."

Head Radical MP Racquet view 2

The slight increase in weight and lower flex rating of this Radical MP equated to greater stability and optimal touch at net. Those characteristics stood out to Jason, who said, "The racquet felt solid up at net. Whether I was simply blocking a shot back on a reaction volley or trying to put away a ball with power, there was enough mass and stability to do both well. I really like the more responsive feel because it helps my touch volleys."

Chris had a similar experience moving forward. He added, "This Radical performed very well at net. I enjoyed the feel and response. I felt connected to my shots and was able to place both my punch and touch volleys well. I played a lot of doubles with this racquet and found it easy to maneuver when the pace picked up. There was also ample stability, so the racquet never felt like it was getting too pushed around. Comfort was good, and all in all, I felt very confident with this Radical at net."

Kristen was impressed with how the Radical MP performed under pressure. She explained, "The Radical MP was easy to get into position; it felt stable and blocked back volleys well. I was particularly impressed with how I was able to get the balls just skimming over the net when I was on the stretch. On slower balls I had to make sure I really stuck my volleys and directed the ball through the court. If I was a little too lax in my motion, the balls would have quite a high trajectory off the stringbed and easily launch off target."

Always looking to close the point out at net, Erik found that the updated Radical MP suited his volley game well. He said, "This racquet was very solid on volleys. I found it to have a nice blend of maneuverability and stability. It was easy to hit volleys deep in the court due to the slightly higher launch angle. This racquet also had really nice feel at net, and I felt connected to the ball overall, especially when hitting drop volleys."

Head Radical MP Racquet view 3

While views varied slightly on serves, our playtesters thought the Head Radical MP offered the qualities needed to close out service games successfully. Chris had no issues settling into a nice, consistent serve. He said, "I was getting enough power on my serves with the Radical MP that I never felt like I had to work too hard. I'm not the biggest server, but my first serves had the pace needed to draw errors from the returner. I could even sneak in some aces with my slice serves wide on the deuce side. I was happy with the spin I was getting on my second serves, and I found I could keep the pace up and still maintain consistency."

There were no complaints on Erik's end. He added, "Serving with this Radical MP was very solid overall. I had really nice power from this racquet and solid placement. I had easy access to spin, and I could hit nice kick serves. My favorite serves to hit were the slice out wide on the deuce side and kick serves out wide on the ad side."

The Radical MP's characteristics came together nicely on Jason's serves. He said, "I felt like the maneuverability, stability, spin and control all added up to make this a very solid serving racquet. I would've liked just a tad more pop on my serves, but other than that, no complaints."

Kristen thought the Radical MP came around a bit slowly on serves. She said, "On serves, the racquet was not quite as whippy overhead as I would like, but the standout feature was how much spin I could get. It took more effort if I wanted to flatten out serves and tap into more power, but I could always rely on spin for placing my serves well if I was too fatigued to try to come up with a bigger serve."

Head Radical MP Racquet view 3

As was the case on groundstrokes, our playtesters found they had a good handle on whatever was thrown at them when returning serve with this Graphene + Radical MP. The stability and easy depth Erik experienced when returning gave him the confidence to go big. He said, "I was able to stay aggressive with my returns and pin my opponents back. There was a good blend of power and control. This racquet performed nicely on first serves when I needed to block back returns, and it felt great when I needed to attack second serves."

Jason enjoyed being able to mix up his return strategy. He described, "The Radical MP offered me versatility on my returns. I liked that I could step in, take a big cut and have the spin help bring the ball down in the court, or block a return back with depth."

The Radical MP continued to impress Chris. He said, "The blend of stability and maneuverability I enjoyed at net and on groundstrokes also felt great on returns. I liked the overall feel. The stringbed felt comfortable while still giving me a good connection to the ball. Taking a good rip at returns was fun with this racquet, as I could generate the spin I needed to keep the ball inside the lines."

"Returning was a favorite aspect of the playtest for me," added Kristen. "I thought the Radical MP offered a nice, controlled response. It stood up well against heavy servers, which allowed me to swing through serves with good stability and feel. I could really get the ball moving through the court when blocking back bigger serves with slice, making what would typically be a more defensive return a pretty offensive one."

Technical Specifications
Length27 in69 cm
Head Size98 sq in sq cm
Weight oz gm
Balance Point13 in 33 cm4pts Head Light
Construction20mm / 23mm / 21mm
CompositionGraphene +/Graphite
String Pattern16 Mains / 19 Crosses
Babolat RDC Ratings
ScoreGrade
Flex Rating65Range:
Swing WeightRange:

 

Chris' Scores
PowerServes
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall
Jason's Scores
PowerServes
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall
Erik's Scores
PowerServes
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall
Kristen's Scores
Power8Serves
ControlGroundstrokes
Maneuverability8Returns9
StabilitySlice9
Comfort8Topspin
Touch/Feel8Volleys8
Overall

Playtester Profiles

Chris: all-court player currently using the Tecnifibre TF40 Chris uses a full-western forehand grip, has a fast swing style and hits a one-handed backhand.

Jason: baseliner with a semi-western forehand and two-handed backhand. Currently using a customized Prince Twistpower X

Erik: Open level all-court player with a one-handed backhand and a western forehand. He is currently using the Yonex EZONE

Kristen: level player with a semi-western forehand and a two handed backhand. Kristen currently plays with a Prince Textreme Tour P.

Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

Our playtesters found the Radical S to be very maneuverable at the baseline, providing great access to spin and depth. Since she enjoyed the previous model of the racquet, Brittany was eager to see how this version compared. She described, "I had high expectations for this Graphene + version because I actually preferred the S over the MP in the previous generation of Radicals, even though the MP is more in my spec range. As expected, this update is easy to use and easy to swing, and I thought the sweetspot was very forgiving. I also found easy power and depth when trading groundstrokes with my opponent. Because the racquet was so whippy, I was able to create the spin I needed with just a flick of my wrist. This access to spin was crucial since it was very easy to overhit with the Radical S, and the spin brought my groundstrokes down inside the baseline. I would say the racquet felt a bit more stable than the specs indicate, but it is on the lighter side. I was looking for a little more mass behind my ball at times."

Tiffani was also excited to get her hands on this update. She said, "I enjoyed the previous version of this Radical S quite a bit, and this updated version felt good too. When I first started playing with this racquet, I hit it with Lynx Tour string installed. While I like this co-poly string (it felt really nice in the Radical MP ), the string felt too firm for the Radical S I used Velocity MLT in subsequent testing sessions, and I liked this racquet much more with the softer multifilament. The softer string opened up the sweetspot and improved comfort. With the string situation settled, I could enjoy how quickly the racquet swung and the easy depth and pace it provided. Even with a larger head size than I typically play with, this racquet offered enough control to keep me in those longer points I tend to play. I wasn't getting the same sort of plow through I get with heavier racquets, but I was able to hit with depth and accuracy to get my opponent moving around the court."

Like Tiffani, Chris found he needed to adjust the strings to really dial in his game. He said, "The Radical S felt super fast and easy to maneuver from the baseline. My first hit with the racquet was with a co-poly string installed, and I didn't find the groove. On my next outing, I hit with Head's Velocity MLT multifilament, and the racquet felt much, much better. The racquet felt crisp and lively enough to give me solid access to both depth and pace. I was able to easily brush the ball for spin since the racquet is so light and fast."

Mark needed a bit of an adjustment period with the Radical S due to its light weight. He said, "From the very first forehand baseline feed, I could tell that the Radical S is both light and head light, requiring me to make adjustments for the next 20 or so groundstrokes. I learned to enjoy its comfortable and nimble feel, along with the easy access to topspin or slice, after several baseline exchanges. The shot I was most challenged by was the inside-out forehand, especially if I was trying to go cross court from a down-the-line shot. Other than that one shot, this racquet was definitely a plus for my groundstroke game."

With its maneuverable weight, the Radical S felt quick up at net. Chris appreciated the feel for his volleys. He said, "I liked the way the Velocity MLT string opened up the sweetspot and combined with the Radical S frame to provide a plush and responsive feel at impact. I strongly recommend using a multi or natural gut string when hitting with a subounce strung racquet such as this beacause the response is usually markedly improved. I was placing my volleys well with the Radical S The racquet felt best on punch volleys. Some added tip speed replaced the weight I was missing from the heavier racquets that I prefer. My touch volleys required a little more tightness and tension at the handle than ideal to help keep the racquet stable."

Brittany also thought that she might want to add a little more weight to the racquet. She explained, "This Radical S feels nice and quick up at net. I could easily get the racquet into position to hit a volley. I did have to be mindful to really punch the ball and give it a little extra oomph. Otherwise, I noticed my volleys floating a little bit. However, I was impressed with my success on half volleys, and I made a couple of good plays up at net. Similar to groundstrokes, I did find some instability, especially when I was reaching for a volley or had a hard-hit passing shot hit right at me."

Tiffani agreed with Brittany. She added, "As expected, maneuverability was the highlight at net. The Radical S was easy to get into position for reflex volleys. For the most part, this racquet's solid feel at net impressed me, but if I was jammed or stretched out, the Radical S showed its light static weight. There were a couple of instances when it felt like the ball hit the strings and just pushed the racquet back. I also needed to be sure to stick my volleys or they would land short and sit up on me."

The Radical S felt fast and easy to use for Mark up at net. He said, "Typically, if a racquet is light enough for me to swing from the baseline over extended periods of time, it is light enough for me not to have any maneuverability excuses at net. That said, I had no issues getting the new Graphene + Radical S into position for any shot inside the service line, and I'm happy to report that there was a high degree of comfort, along with sufficient stability."

The Radical S 's great access to spin and maneuverability allowed our playtesters to maximize their serve potential. Tiffani found herself generating impressive pace on her serves without breaking a sweat. She explained, "I love a racquet that swings quickly overhead like this Radical S. This meant I could serve without getting tired. My favorite serve to hit with this racquet was my flat serve. I may not have been hitting heavy serves, but I could get good pace on the ball. The decent control levels also let me move the ball around the box successfully."

Brittany really put the Radical S through its paces when it came to serving. She said, "I tested the Radical S to the max on serves, hitting a variety of shots to see what best suited the racquet. Because it was easy to get the racquet up and over my head, it was no surprise that the flat first serve was the most successful. I could execute some nice slice out wide on the deuce side, but it was a little up and down. When it came to kick second serves, I was able to access that topspin. However, the serves were not kicking up as much I would have liked and ended up sitting in my opponent's strike zone."

Mark needed to make some adjustments to get the most out of his serves with this racquet. He said, "Like my forehand and backhand, my serve did require that extra time to gain confidence. Although you cannot get that 'heavy-racquet effect' serving with a ounce racquet, the more I tested this racquet, the better I served. I learned to use more wrist snap and racquet head speed. Overall, the serve became my favorite shot to hit with the Radical S "

Chris tapped into the Radical S 's spin potential on serves. He said, "I was able to find a solid groove hitting medium-paced, spin-loaded serves with the Radical S. I had lots of fun hitting an off-pace slice serve wide on the deuce side that either went for an ace or pulled my opponent so far off court I had an open court to attack on my next shot. I would either add some weight to this racquet or string it very low to get some added juice on flat first serves."

On returns, our playtesters found great maneuverability from the Radical S , but it did get pushed around at times. Mark explained, "Return of serve was the one shot where I did feel more vulnerable to big pace and spin on the ball with the Radical S in my hands. If it were a medium-paced serve, I had zero stability issues hitting the return."

Brittany enjoyed the way the racquet moved through the air on returns. She said, "The Radical S continued to impress in the maneuverability department when returning serves. At the beginning of the playtest I was a bit early on some of my returns because of how quickly the racquet swung through the air. I had to dial back and wait an extra split second to get my timing right. I could really swing out on returns, but I had to make sure I added spin to keep the ball in the court. Against first serves, the racquet was twisting in my hand at times, but it wasn't something that I didn't expect."

Tiffani had similar thoughts. She added, "The quick swing was again a benefit when starting the point off on returns. I could get a full swing in when I wanted to be more offensive with my returns. This Radical S also felt more stable than I would expect from a racquet with its specs. I thought the response was comfortable with Velocity MLT string installed."

For the most part, Chris liked this racquet on returns as well. He said, "The Radical S came through contact very quickly on returns. I was able to take a pretty solid cut at the ball, which resulted in good pace and spin. I was very happy with the comfort level of the racquet, and I also felt connected to the ball. My block returns required a bit more punch to them to redirect heavy incoming pace, but overall I thought the Radical S felt comfortable in every returning situation."

Technical Specifications
Length27 in69 cm
Head Size sq in sq cm
Weight oz gm
Balance Point in 33 cm4 pts Head Light
Construction22mm / 25mm / 23mm
CompositionGraphene +/Graphite
String Pattern16 Mains / 19 Crosses
Babolat RDC Ratings
ScoreGrade
Flex Rating63Range:
Swing WeightRange:

 

Brittany's Scores
PowerServes8
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall8
Tiffani's Scores
PowerServes
Control8Groundstrokes
Maneuverability9Returns
StabilitySlice
Comfort8Topspin
Touch/FeelVolleys8
Overall
Chris' Scores
PowerServes8
ControlGroundstrokes
Maneuverability9Returns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall
Mark's Scores
Power7Serves
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
Stability7Slice7
Comfort8Topspin
Touch/Feel7Volleys
Overall

Playtester Profiles

Brittany: Open level player with a semi-western forehand and a two-handed backhand. She currently plays with the Yonex EZONE (g).

Tiffani: level baseliner with a semi-western grip on the forehand and hits a two-handed backhand. Currently playing with the Prince Textreme Tour P ().

Chris: all-court player currently using the Tecnifibre TF40 Chris uses a full-western forehand grip, has a fast swing style and hits a one-handed backhand.

Mark: lefty all-court player with a one-handed backhand. He currently plays with the Yonex EZONE 98+.

Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

Our playtesters found the Radical S to be very maneuverable at the baseline, providing great access to spin and depth. Since she enjoyed the previous model of the racquet, Brittany was eager to see how this version compared. She described, "I had high expectations for this Graphene + version because I actually preferred the S over the MP in the previous generation of Radicals, even though the MP is more in my spec range. As expected, this update is easy to use and easy to swing, and I thought the sweetspot was very forgiving. I also found easy power and depth when trading groundstrokes with my opponent, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review. Because the racquet was so whippy, I was able to create the spin I needed with just a flick of my wrist. This access to spin was crucial since it was very easy to overhit with the Radical S, and the spin brought my groundstrokes down inside the baseline. I would say the racquet felt a bit more stable than the specs indicate, but it is on the lighter side. I was looking for a little more mass behind my ball at times."

Tiffani was also excited to get her hands on this update. She said, "I enjoyed the previous version of this Radical S quite a bit, and this updated version felt good too. When I first started playing with this racquet, I hit it with Lynx Tour string installed. While I like this co-poly string (it felt really nice in the Radical MP ), the string felt too firm for the Radical S I used Velocity MLT in subsequent testing sessions, and I liked this racquet much more with the softer multifilament. The softer string opened up the sweetspot and improved comfort. With the string situation settled, I could enjoy how quickly the racquet swung and the easy depth and pace it provided. Even with a larger head size than I typically play with, this racquet offered enough control to keep me in those longer points I tend to play. I wasn't getting the same sort of plow through I get with heavier racquets, but I was able to hit with depth and accuracy to get my opponent moving around the court."

Like Tiffani, Chris found he needed to adjust the strings to really dial in his game. He said, "The Radical S felt super fast and easy to maneuver from the baseline. My first hit with the racquet was with a co-poly string installed, and I didn't find the groove. On my next outing, I hit with Head's Velocity MLT multifilament, and the racquet felt much, much better. The racquet felt crisp and lively enough to give me solid access to both depth and pace. I was able to easily brush the ball for spin since the racquet is so light and fast."

Mark needed a bit of an adjustment period with the Radical S due to its light weight. He said, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, "From the very first forehand baseline feed, I could tell that the Radical S is both light and head light, requiring me to make adjustments for the next 20 or so groundstrokes. I learned to enjoy its comfortable and nimble feel, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, along with the easy access to topspin or slice, after several baseline exchanges. The shot I was most challenged by was the inside-out forehand, especially if I was trying to go cross court from a down-the-line shot. Other than that one shot, this racquet was definitely a plus for my groundstroke game."

With its maneuverable weight, the Radical S felt quick up at net. Chris appreciated the feel for his volleys. He said, "I liked the way the Velocity MLT string opened up the sweetspot and combined with the Radical S frame to provide a plush and responsive feel at impact. I strongly recommend using a multi or natural gut string when hitting with a subounce strung racquet such as this beacause the response is usually markedly improved. I was placing my volleys well with the Radical S The racquet felt best on punch volleys. Some added tip speed replaced the weight I was missing from the heavier racquets that I prefer. My touch volleys required a little more tightness and tension at the handle than ideal to help keep the racquet stable."

Brittany also thought that she might want to add a little more weight to the racquet. She explained, "This Radical S feels nice and quick up at net. I could easily get the racquet into position to hit a volley. I did have to be mindful to really punch the ball and give it a little extra oomph. Otherwise, I noticed my volleys floating a little bit. However, I was impressed with my success on half volleys, and I made a couple of good plays up at net. Similar to groundstrokes, I did find some instability, especially when I was reaching for a volley or had a hard-hit passing shot hit right at me."

Tiffani agreed with Brittany. She added, "As expected, maneuverability was the highlight at net. The Radical S was easy to get into position for reflex volleys. For the most part, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, this racquet's solid feel at net impressed me, but if I was jammed or stretched out, the Radical S showed its light static weight. There were a couple of instances when it felt like the ball hit the strings and just pushed the racquet back. I also needed to be sure to stick my volleys or they would land short and sit up on me."

The Radical S felt fast and easy to use for Mark up at net. He said, "Typically, if a racquet is light enough for me to swing from the baseline over extended periods of time, it is light enough for me not to have any maneuverability excuses at net. That said, I had no issues getting the new Graphene + Radical S into position for any shot inside the service line, and I'm happy to report that there was a high degree of comfort, along with sufficient stability."

The Radical S 's great access to spin and maneuverability allowed our playtesters to maximize their serve potential. Tiffani found herself generating impressive pace on her serves without breaking a sweat. She explained, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, "I love a racquet that swings quickly overhead like this Radical S. Head graphene radical s tennis racquet review meant I could serve without getting tired. My head graphene radical s tennis racquet review serve to hit with this racquet was my flat serve. I may not have head graphene radical s tennis racquet review hitting heavy serves, but I could get good pace on the ball. The decent control levels also let me move the ball around the box successfully."

Brittany really put the Radical S through its paces when it came to serving. She said, "I tested the Radical S to the max on serves, hitting a variety of shots to see what best suited the racquet. Because it was easy to get the racquet up and over my head, it was no surprise that the flat first serve was the most successful. I could execute some nice slice out wide on the deuce side, but it was a little up and down. When it came to kick second serves, I was able to access that topspin. However, the serves were not kicking up as much I would have liked and ended up sitting in my opponent's strike zone."

Mark needed to make some adjustments to get the most out of his serves with this racquet. He said, "Like my forehand and backhand, my serve did require that extra time to gain confidence. Although you cannot get that 'heavy-racquet effect' serving with a ounce racquet, the more I tested this racquet, the better I served. I learned to use more wrist snap and racquet head speed. Overall, the serve became my favorite shot to hit with the Radical S "

Chris tapped into the Radical S 's spin potential on serves. He said, "I was able to find a solid groove hitting medium-paced, spin-loaded serves with the Radical S. I had lots of fun hitting an off-pace slice serve wide on the deuce side that either went for an ace or pulled my opponent so far off court I had an open court to attack on my next shot. I would either add some weight to this racquet or string it very low to get some added juice on flat first serves."

On returns, our playtesters found great maneuverability from the Radical S , but it did get pushed around at times. Mark explained, "Return of serve was the one shot where I did feel more vulnerable to big pace and spin on the ball with the Radical S in my hands. If it were a medium-paced serve, I had zero stability issues hitting the return."

Brittany enjoyed the way the racquet moved through the air on returns. She said, "The Radical S continued to impress in the maneuverability department when returning serves. At the beginning of the playtest I was a bit early on some of my returns because of how quickly the racquet swung through the air. I had to dial back and wait an extra split second to get my timing right. I could really swing out on returns, but I had to make sure I added spin to keep the ball in the court. Against first serves, the racquet was twisting in my hand at times, but it wasn't something that I didn't expect."

Tiffani had similar thoughts. She added, "The quick swing was again a benefit when starting the point off on returns. I could get a full swing in when I wanted to be more offensive with my returns. This Radical S also felt more stable than I would expect from a racquet with its specs. I thought the response was comfortable with Velocity MLT string installed."

For the head graphene radical s tennis racquet review part, Chris liked this racquet on returns as well. He said, "The Radical S came through contact very quickly on returns. I was able to take a pretty solid cut at the ball, which resulted in good pace and spin, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review. I was very happy with the comfort level of the racquet, and I also felt connected to the ball. My block returns required a bit more punch to them to redirect heavy incoming pace, but overall I thought the Radical S felt comfortable in every returning situation."

Technical Specifications
Length27 in69 cm
Head Size sq in sq cm
Weight oz gm
Balance Point in 33 cm4 pts Head Light
Construction22mm / 25mm / 23mm
CompositionGraphene +/Graphite
String Pattern16 Mains / 19 Crosses
Babolat RDC Ratings
ScoreGrade
Flex Rating63Range:
Swing WeightRange:

 

Brittany's Scores
PowerServes8
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall8
Tiffani's Scores
PowerServes
Control8Groundstrokes
Maneuverability9Returns
StabilitySlice
Comfort8Topspin
Touch/FeelVolleys8
Overall
Chris' Scores
PowerServes8
ControlGroundstrokes
Maneuverability9Returns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall
Mark's Scores
Power7Serves
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
Stability7Slice7
Comfort8Topspin
Touch/Feel7Volleys
Overall

Playtester Profiles

Brittany: Open level player with a semi-western forehand and a two-handed backhand. She currently plays with the Yonex EZONE (g).

Tiffani: level baseliner with a semi-western grip on the forehand and hits a two-handed backhand, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review. Currently playing with the Prince Textreme Tour P ().

Chris: all-court player currently using the Tecnifibre TF40 Chris uses a full-western forehand grip, has a fast swing style and hits a one-handed backhand.

Mark: lefty all-court player with a one-handed backhand. He currently plays with the Yonex EZONE 98+.

Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

Whether playing more offensively or defensively, using topspin or opting for slice, our playtesters thought the Radical MP excelled from the back of the court. Having tested previous generations, Jason appreciated the improvements with this update. He said, "There's a lot to like about the updated Radical MP on groundstrokes. I immediately noticed this racquet's improved feel. The feel wasn’t as muted, so I was able to tell where on the stringbed I was hitting my shots. I thought the racquet was user-friendly, with great access to spin and depth, and the added 5 grams of weight made this version more stable and solid. One of my favorite shots to hit was my backhand slice; I found I could hit a 'dirtier' slice with this racquet versus the previous version or my own racquet."

New to the Radical line, Kristen praised the racquet's performance on her groundstrokes. She said, "This was my first time playtesting the Radical MP, and I enjoyed many aspects of its playability. There was a really nice feel off the stringbed, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review. It was dampened, but not to the point that I'd get lost in it; I still had a good feel and read on my shots. It was super easy to get spin on the ball; it felt effortless off of the stringbed. That made it simple to get balls dipping deep right at the baseline. When defending or counterpunching, I was not only impressed by how well the racquet handled pace, but I also felt that I was getting natural spin on the ball, making my defensive shots that much more effective. It was also easy to drive slices through the court."

Chris felt dialed in regardless of his shot choice. He explained, "I loved the response of this latest Radical MP off the baseline. I felt like I had total command over my targeting. Whether I was hitting a drive shot, looping the ball or floating a slice, I was able to hit my mark with good consistency. My topspin shots had plenty of spin to get the ball to drop nicely inside the lines, and my slice shots had excellent bite to them. I liked the feel of the racquet. The response was solid and stable (surprisingly so for its weight), and it felt very comfortable, yet I also had lots of touch with it. From tip to handle, the Graphene + Radical MP just felt like a very well put-together racquet on every groundstroke. I think Head did a good job of bringing back the feel and stability of past Radicals without losing the easy power and spin from recent versions."

The praise continued from Erik. He added, "I really liked this Radical MP on groundstrokes. It took a little getting used to at first, but once I dialed it in, this racquet was really solid off of the ground. I could get nice plow through and hit a really heavy ball with a lot of spin."

Head Radical MP Racquet view 2

The slight increase in weight and lower flex rating of this Radical MP equated to greater stability and optimal touch at net. Those characteristics stood out to Jason, who said, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, "The racquet felt solid up at net. Whether I was simply blocking a shot back on a reaction volley or trying to put away a ball with power, there was enough mass and stability to do both well. I really like the more responsive feel because it helps my touch volleys."

Chris had a similar experience moving forward. He added, "This Radical performed very well at net. I enjoyed the feel and response. I felt connected to my shots and was able to place both my punch and touch volleys well. I played a lot of doubles with this racquet and found it easy to maneuver when the pace picked up. There was also ample stability, so the racquet never felt like it was getting too pushed around. Comfort was good, and all in all, I felt very confident with this Radical at net."

Kristen was impressed with how the Radical MP performed under pressure. She explained, "The Radical MP was easy to get into position; it felt stable and blocked back volleys well. I was particularly impressed with how I was able to get the balls just skimming over the net when I was on the stretch. On slower balls I had to make sure I really stuck my volleys and directed the ball through the court. If I was a little too lax in my motion, the balls would have quite a high trajectory off the stringbed and easily launch off target."

Always looking to close the point out at net, Erik found that the updated Radical MP suited his volley game well. He said, "This racquet was very solid on volleys. I found it to have a nice blend of maneuverability and stability. It was easy to hit volleys deep in the court due to the slightly higher launch angle. This racquet also had really nice feel at net, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, and I felt connected to the ball overall, especially when hitting drop volleys."

Head Radical MP Racquet view 3

While views varied slightly on serves, our playtesters thought the Head Radical MP offered the qualities needed to close out service games successfully. Chris had no issues settling into a nice, consistent serve. He said, "I was getting enough power on my serves with the Radical MP that I never felt like I had to work too hard. I'm not the biggest server, but my first serves had the pace needed to draw errors from the returner. I could even sneak in some aces with my slice serves wide on the deuce side, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review. I was happy with the spin I was getting on my second serves, and I found I could keep the pace up and still maintain consistency."

There were no complaints on Erik's end. He added, "Serving with this Radical MP was very solid overall. I had really nice power from this racquet and solid placement. I ocean kayak big game ii easy access to spin, and I could hit nice kick serves. My favorite serves to hit were the slice out wide on the deuce side and kick serves out wide on the ad side."

The Radical MP's characteristics came together nicely on Jason's serves. He said, "I felt like the maneuverability, stability, spin and control all added up to make this a very solid serving racquet. I would've liked just a tad more pop on my serves, but other than that, no complaints."

Kristen thought the Radical MP came around a bit slowly on serves. She said, "On serves, the racquet was not quite as whippy overhead as I would like, but the standout feature was how much spin I could get. It took more effort if I wanted to flatten out serves and tap into more power, but I head graphene radical s tennis racquet review always rely on spin for placing my serves well if I was too fatigued to try to come up with a bigger serve."

Head Radical MP Racquet view 3

As was the case on groundstrokes, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, our playtesters found they had a good handle on whatever was thrown at them when returning serve with this Graphene + Radical MP. The stability and easy depth Erik experienced when returning gave him the confidence to go big. He said, "I was able to stay aggressive with my returns and pin my opponents back. There was a good blend of power and control. This racquet performed nicely on first serves when I needed to block back returns, and it felt great when I needed to attack second serves."

Jason enjoyed being able to mix up his return strategy. He described, "The Radical MP offered me versatility on my returns. I liked that I could step in, take a big cut and have the spin help bring the ball down in the court, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, or block a return back with depth."

The Radical MP continued to impress Chris. He said, "The blend of stability and maneuverability I enjoyed at net and on groundstrokes also felt great on returns. I liked the overall feel. The stringbed felt comfortable while still giving me a good connection to the ball. Taking a good rip at returns was fun with this racquet, as I could generate the spin I needed to keep the ball inside the lines."

"Returning was a favorite aspect of the playtest for me," added Kristen. "I thought the Radical MP offered a nice, controlled response. It stood up well against heavy servers, which allowed me to swing through serves with good stability and feel. I could really get the ball moving through the court when blocking back bigger serves with slice, making what would typically be a more defensive return a pretty offensive one."

Technical Specifications
Length27 in69 cm
Head Size98 sq in sq cm
Weight oz gm
Balance Point13 in 33 cm4pts Head Light
Construction20mm / 23mm / 21mm
CompositionGraphene +/Graphite
String Pattern16 Mains / 19 Crosses
Babolat RDC Ratings
ScoreGrade
Flex Rating65Range:
Swing WeightRange:

 

Chris' Scores
PowerServes
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall
Jason's Scores
PowerServes
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall
Erik's Scores
PowerServes
ControlGroundstrokes
ManeuverabilityReturns
StabilitySlice
ComfortTopspin
Touch/FeelVolleys
Overall
Kristen's Scores
Power8Serves
ControlGroundstrokes
Maneuverability8Returns9
StabilitySlice9
Comfort8Topspin
Touch/Feel8Volleys8
Overall

Playtester Profiles

Chris: all-court player currently using the Hockey style hoodie sweatshirt TF40 Chris uses a full-western forehand grip, has a fast swing style and hits a one-handed backhand.

Jason: baseliner with a semi-western forehand and two-handed backhand. Currently using a customized Prince Twistpower X

Erik: Open level all-court player with a one-handed backhand and a western forehand. He is currently using the Yonex EZONE

Kristen: level player with a semi-western forehand and a two handed backhand. Kristen currently plays with a Prince Textreme Tour P.

Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

After my tennis friend and racquet junkie, Henrik Wallensten, reviewed the new HEAD Graphene Radical MP favorably, I was, of course, very curious about the Pro version. So here is my HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review.

I did enjoy the updates both to the Extreme and Speed Pro racquets and I think HEAD Graphene technology is an improvement over the Graphene Touch generation. Why? Well, I think they have managed to find a solid connection to the string bed. I really know where I will hit my shot with all the Graphene racquets I&#;ve tried and that is a good thing. The &#;hollow feel&#; does bother me a bit with these frames but after finding a good setup with string and tension, I am quite positive about this racquet. Find out the pros and cons in this HEAD Graphene Radical Pro racquet review by reading on&#;

So what is Graphene ? Well, as Henrik mentioned in his Graphene Radical MP review, HEAD have placed graphene in the shaft and in the head at 9, 12 and 3 (clockwise). This creates a more solid feel without adding weight to the frame. The idea is to make the racquet easy and fast to swing, but still solid when it comes to blocking back shots, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review. If I would compare it to perhaps my favorite Radical of all time, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, the IG Radical Pro, this one is crisper and offers a more feedback from the string bed. The downside with the Radical Pro for me was the launch angle, which could send the ball flying at times. This one is definitely more controlled.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Specs

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

The main difference with the HEAD Graphene Radical Pro and the MP is the weight. There are 15 more grams on the Pro and that is why it is 5 mm more head-light. If you want to get a real pro player swing weight, you can replace the grommet for a so-called CAP grommet that covers the whole frame. That along with a leather grip could be an excellent way to get this racquet to play in pro spec.

WEIGHT (UNSTRUNG):  g / oz
STRING PATTERN: 16/19
HEAD SIZE:  cm² / 98 in²
BALANCE: mm
LENGTH: mm / in
BEAM: 20/23/21 mm

I rarely mention design on Tennisnerd, but I want to say that the cosmetics of the Graphene Radical Pro is an improvement over the previous Spiderman-themed racquet. But that is obviously a highly subjective thing.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; How does it play?

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

Finding the right string for a racquet is important. It can completely change the character of the whole frame. At first, I strung it up with one of my go-to strings, HEAD Hawk Touch at 24 kg. I love Hawk Touch in a powerful racquet, but I quickly noticed that the Radical is too low-powered for such a string and tension. I thought the previous edition was quite powerful and this one is much more controlled and it is easier to connect with the ball. But the response with HEAD Hawk Touch felt a bit board-like and racquets that play like that crave a lower tension.

The launch angle of the Radical Pro is not low like an 18&#;20, but definitely lower than many 16&#;19, 98 sq inch racquets I&#;ve tried. That is partly why I thought that Solinco Tour Bite Soft at 22,5 kg would be perfect in this frame. And the string did make the string bed softer, more spin-friendly and since the racquet is low-powered it was just a perfect blend.

I was testing the racquet together with Nikunj Siwach who is a good player (a couple of ATP points to his name) and an excellent coach and he also loved the combination of string and racquet. He actually said that it was the best racquet he has tried in a while and I usually bring a bag of racquets to the court for us to test. So thumbs up from him. You can see him hitting with the racquet in the video review and he was hitting winners left, right and center.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Who is it for?

I struggled a bit with this racquet at first. The feel with the Graphene can be a tad &#;hollow&#; as opposed to the solid feel of a foam-filled racquet. But once I dialed in the string setup and tension, I felt really connected to the ball. I did not really see the need to add any lead tape to the racquet as it was pretty stable in stock form. Perhaps I would add a little bit at 12 to bump up the swing weight, but with a lower tension, I felt the sweet spot really opened up.

This racquet is head graphene radical s tennis racquet review for more advanced players. If I would put the different Graphene racquets in a skill level chart, I would put the Graphene Extreme as the easiest to use, the Speed as requiring a little bit more and the Radical as racquet for more advanced players, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review. The sweet spot is not huge, but the ball goes where you want it to if you play with proper technique and footwork. Yes, the MP will be easier to use, but the 98 sq inch head size asks a bit more from you than the sq inch Speed, Instinct and Extreme lines. This makes me very curious about the update to the Prestige line. That will definitely be a players racquet!

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Stroke by stroke

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

I think the HEAD Graphene Radical Pro does most things well and nothing stands out. The racquets ask the question of the head graphene radical s tennis racquet review. In the right hands, it can be a weapon. In the wrong hands, it can be a touch demanding. I think intermediate to advanced players should give this one a go if they&#;re looking for a solid racquet to work on their tennis with. String it low to open up some more power and spin and you have a really nice racquet on your hands.

If you want a bit more room for customization, the MP might be the way to go, but I felt the Pro did the job without requiring me to add lead tape to it. And if you want more weight, you can always go for the CAP grommets.

Just a few words on the different strokes.

Groundstrokes &#; This racquet puts the ball where you intend it to go. You don&#;t get a lot for free so if you are keen on improving your tennis, this can be a racquet to bring on your journey.

Volleys &#; Not a rock on off-center hits like many heavier frames, but good feel and stability.

Serves &#; I thought the Radical Pro came through the air nicely and gave a nice pop on serves. Not close to the Extreme, but with excellent precision.

Like I wrote above, I liked this racquet from everywhere on the court. It wasn&#;t the best anywhere, but I felt like I was in charge and that is a big plus for me.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Summary

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review

HEAD has made a step in the right direction with the Graphene series. I definitely feel these are the best Graphene racquets yet and the Radical Pro is no exception. They have finetuned the feel to be more precise and this is a really versatile racquet in the hands of the right player. On contact, I get nostalgic about the IG Radical series, but this one feels a bit better balanced overall.

With my transition to a semi-western grip, I felt like this racquet could help me groove into my new style of play in a good way. Comparing it to my love affair with the Clash, it is not as easy to use, but when the Clash launches the ball on flatter shots, I could return to this racquet and rely on it a hundred percent. So for advanced players looking for that special connection to the ball, give this one a shot.

HEAD Graphene Radical Pro Racquet Review &#; Video

***

Do you like Tennisnerd? Please also follow and share our other channels. Every like, share and follow is deeply appreciated! You can now also become a Tennisnerd patron and receive unique content and reviews before everyone else!

Patreon – Support and get VIP content
YouTube – In-depth video reviews and vlog
Instagram – Racquets, racquets, racquets
Twitter
Facebook Page – New content daily
Facebook Group – Join the discussion with other tennis nerds
Amazon Influencer

About tennis racquets
All racquet reviews
Here is a great racquet buying guide to get you started.
What tennis racquet should I buy?
Top tennis racquets to buy right now
The Gear of the Year
The Gear of the Year
The Gear of the Year
Tennis racquets for juniors
Tennis racquets for kids

Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

Head Graphene Radical S Racket Review

Head has revamped the Radical range with their Graphene technology and a great new paint job so we thought we’d get the Head Graphene Radical S out to put it through its paces.

My cousin, who’s a developing player recently bought this racket and loves everything about it, so I thought it was time to find out what the fuss is about!

Although I’ve never used the Radical range myself, I would have to say it’s one of the most consistent racket ranges out there.

You know what you’re going to get with these rackets, and they always offer a nice balance between power, spin, and control.

The updated Radical S brings Graphene technology to this racket and should address one of the weaker areas of the Radical rackets &#; comfort.

Graphene reinforces the frame to add a little bit more stability and comfort on contact, which should make playing head graphene radical s tennis racquet review this racket a bit more comfortable.

In the past, comfort would probably have been the one area where I would have some criticism of the Radical rackets, so I’m hopeful that the new technology will see big improvements in this area.

Specs wise, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, the Graphene Radical S looks ideal for developing players, with a manageable g unstrung weight and a forgiving sq inch head.

All the Radical rackets tend to be pretty maneuverable but with its headlight balance, the Radical S should encourage some seriously speedy shots.

This leads me to believe that the Head Graphene Radical S should be looking to compete with rackets like the Wilson Blade 98L, the Prince Textreme Beast and the Babolat Pure Strike Team.

All of these rackets offer a nice set up for developing players, and a good balance between spin, power, and control that should really help players looking to play an all-round game.

Like these other rackets, I think the Head Graphene Radical S is nicely set up for a wide range of players, from juniors to intermediate adults, all the way through to senior players.

That’s because the Radical S promises lightweight maneuverability with solid performance, ideal for those players who don’t want a heavy racket.

We often get asked what kind of string set up we use for our playtests, so I’ll let you know what we used for our Graphene Radical S review and the thinking behind it.

I always lean towards control, and since the Radical S is a much lighter racket than I would normally use, I went for a very control oriented setup of Big Banger Original at 54 lbs.

Now, this setup is certainly not for everyone, so if you want a little advice on how to set up your new racket then check out Tom’s Tennis String Tension Guide.

I pretty much always say this, but I was especially excited for this playtest as I was interested to see just what it was that sold this racket to my cousin.

I was hopeful that it would be great performance rather than just a bit of a sales pitch!

Every shot is important, but certainly, in today’s game, groundstrokes are your bread and butter shots.

If you’re not comfortable hitting groundstrokes with your racket then you need a new racket, simple as that.

Otherwise, you’ll just see your performance drop and the injuries build up.

The good news is that racket companies have been making huge strides in racket comfort, and we can see that with Head’s Graphene technology.

This upgrade has gone really nicely into the Radical S and I must say, it is so easy to use.

It swings so naturally but yet, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, has head graphene radical s tennis racquet review stability on contact given its weight.

You don’t get too many harsh vibrations from this stick but you also don’t have to sacrifice greatly on performance.

If you’re a beginner or intermediate then this is great news!

Of the rackets I mentioned earlier, I found the Radical S to be most similar to the Babolat Pure Strike Team, but I must admit, I found the Radical easier to use.

The sq inch head is more user-friendly and offers a little bit more easy power, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review, which for me made this racket an excellent intermediate’s racket.

The Radical doesn’t quite have the same levels of performance as the Wilson Blade 98L in my opinion, but I did find it to be much more forgiving.

The Wilson’s 98 sq inch head is slightly more difficult to play with, but in return, you do get better control.

Like any racket, it’s really a question of what you’re looking for, and if you want easy playability with good performance then this Head Graphene Radical S is a brilliant option.

Personally, as a slightly more experienced player, I would choose the Wilson Blade 98L out of all of these because of its excellent performance levels.

However, the Blade 98L is my highest ranked racket under g and the Head Graphene Radical S certainly isn’t far behind it.

If it’s easy playability you’re looking for then take a look at this racket!

I’ve given the Head Graphene Radical S a 7 out of 10 on the groundstrokes.

For a developing player, one of the most important qualities from a racket at the net is easy maneuverability. Head graphene radical s tennis racquet review want to be able to get your racket into position nice and quickly, ready to block the ball back.

As we’ve already found out, the Head Graphene Radical S has excellent maneuverability, so that makes it easy to volley with.

Because of its weight, the Radical S isn’t going to have the kind of stability that is necessary for volleying at the highest level, but you don’t need that as a developing player.

You just need something that you find easy to work with and will be able to control the ball enough to give you a solid base.

I found that the Radical S did exactly that, and proved itself to be a great racket for developing players once more.

The other thing I greatly appreciated with this racket was the comfort levels.

As I’ve said before, this was an area I always had concerns with when it came to Radical rackets.

I don’t know if it was just me but I found them a little bit stiff.

That has changed with the Head Graphene Radical S though and you can really notice it when you’re volleying.

Again, compared to the other three rackets, I would say that the Wilson Blade 98L offers the best performance levels at the net, but when it comes to playability I would choose the Radical S.

It’s delightfully easy to play with and you don’t have to sacrifice much on performance.

I enjoyed playing with the Head Graphene Radical S at the net, and gave it a very solid 7 out of 10 for its performance.

I find the serve to be the most difficult balancing act for a racket. I want maneuverability but I also want stability and it’s not often you get the perfect blend of both.

For me, the Radical S just leaned a little bit too much towards maneuverability and I did lose a little bit of performance on serve.

That’s not to say the balance of this racket is wrong for everyone though, and I think that for the majority of developing players, maneuverability would be more important than stability on serve.

This is because the serve is a very complex shot that’s difficult to perfect so it’s much easier to have a racket that you’re comfortable getting into position.

If you can begin to maximize your racket head speed on the serve then you can really start to increase the power you get on the shot.

The speed of the Radical S and it’s easy playability allow you to do this and that’s one aspect I particularly like about this racket &#; it encourages you to improve.

As you develop into a more advanced player then you might find it’s time to move to a slightly heavier racket, but while you’re still perfecting the serve, the Radical S is a very good racket.

I gave the Head Graphene Radical S a out of 10 on the serve, its lowest score of the playtest.

This isn’t a bad score, especially for a g racket, it’s just the one area where I missed the extra stability of a heavier racket.

Overall, I was very impressed with the improvements these rackets have made with the introduction of Graphene technology.

The Head Graphene Radical S is now an extremely maneuverable racket that’s very comfortable to play with.

The best part is that it does this without sacrificing too much on performance.

I found the Radical S performed particularly well from the back of the court, where its easy playability makes it ideal for beginner and intermediate players.

There’s a tendency for light rackets to be a bit flimsy and lack performance, but I certainly didn’t get that feeling from this stick.

If it’s maneuverability you’re after then you certainly won’t be disappointed with the Head’s groundstroke performance.

At net, the easy nature of this racket continues, and developing players are bound to benefit from this.

You’ve got to feel confident that you can get into position quickly when you’re at the net, and you can’t fail to do that with the Radical S.

Of course, at g it’s never going to have massive stability, but as long as you’re not playing at too high of a level this shouldn’t be a problem.

On a personal note, I found the weakest part of this playtest to be on the serve.

I found I was craving more stability and thus the ability to inject more power into the shot.

This is a personal preference though, and I do think developing players will be more concerned with maneuverability than stability.

If that’s the case then you won’t be disappointed with the Radical S.

All in all, I would say this was an excellent playtest.

The Head Graphene Radical S is a racket that I would recommend to any developing player who wants a racket that is highly maneuverable and comfortable.

I gave the Radical S a solid 7 out of

Is This Racket Right For Your Game? Find Out With a Custom Fitting!

Discover Your Excalibur!

Groundstrokes

7

out of 10

Get the Head Graphene Radical S Racket for the Best Price from RacquetGuys!

Buy Now
Источник: [casinoextra.fr]

Head Radical #peoplesracket

The Radical name is an iconic range in tennis and has been since Head graphene radical s tennis racquet review Agassi first used the original way back in the s. Players like Andy Murray, Sloane Stephens and Taylor Fritz have all used the Radical over the years. Diego Schwartzman French Open Semi finalist also uses the Head graphene radical s tennis racquet review Radical. Over twenty years later the Head Radical range is still going strong. will see the launch of the Head Radical with a new frame mould.

Head popped a prototype Radical frameset in the post and asked us to carry out a playtest. We have been told its the MP version. The Head Radical MP is normally a standard 98 sq inch but other than that little is known about the new frame. Head never reveal the actual specs of the racket we only know that it is a Radical MP Prototype.

UPDATE Scroll down for the images of the actual colours for the Head Radical

First Thoughts 

The racket was strung with a polyester string (Head Lynx Tour) at 52lbs. String pattern is 16&#;19 which is the same as previous Head Radicals. This Radical is the MP version meaning it comes in at 98sq inch. The frame itself is quite similar to previous frames with a long throat ( well at least it seems that way) and a good size MP head. The design is quite unique. There will be other models in the Radical line up including the Pro Model which is alleson youth reversible solo series football pant little heavier and the lighter and junior models. Agassi played with a Head Radical Oversize in his latter career which came in at sq inch. This has not been in production for years.

What does the Head Radical MP play like?

I have play tested many rackets this year but there is a familiarity with the Head Radical. I guess this is an obvious statement to say given that I have played with Head Radicals for nearly 20 years.I noticed the crisp feel off the middle of the strings with this racket. I feel I can hit groundstrokes and get awesome control. The ball goes where I want it to all the time. For me the Radical is just comfortable. After my first hit with the Head Radical I pine canyon golf club scorecard buzzing. There is a liveliness about the middle of the strings that I just cannot create with anything else.

Flexibility 

I would describe this is quite a stiff racket. Ofcourse there is some flex when under contact with the tennis ball but not much. It feels as if most of my swing is translated into the tennis ball with little being lost. Some rackets now have a very muted feel. They are made from materials which absorb the vibrations from the strings. The Head Radical MP is notably stiffer than most rackets but it is still comfortable. I like this as I enjoy feeling the ball on my strings. I feel it helps my game with control in a big way. Creatively with spin or touch I feel confident with the Radical. I guess its like playing football in bare feet and being able to have that control of the ball with your skin.

Power

The Radical range has been synonymous with control and precision. If you want power perhaps this racket is not for you. I have a long fast swing and find the Radical a great racket to reign in my wayward swings. The beam on this racket would indicate this also. The big is narrow perhaps between 21 and 24mm. With the balance and weight of this racket I was able to swing freely and take big cuts at the ball, head graphene radical s tennis racquet review.

Spin

Many players will be keen to find out does the Radical produce lots of Spin? This Radical is a player&#;s racket, and as such players will fully developed swings will thrive with it. The relatively open 16&#;19 string pattern ensures easy spin production.

Sweet Spot.

The Head Radical MP has a reasonable sweet spot. I am prone to off centre head graphene radical s tennis racquet review and the Radical MP doesn&#;t feel great but what racket does if you go off centre? If I compare this to another Head racket I love; the Head Gravity, the Gravity is a little more forgiving but lacks the precision of the Radical. My forehand drive from the baseline loves this frame, I can really plough through the ball low and hard and can hit all my spots when I need to. The trouble is with my backhand being my weaker side I found that I really had to centre the shot or it just was not as good. This is really a fault of my game rather than the racket as such. I guess the lesson here is work on my backhand to ensure I am middling my backhand every time.

This racket drops in January so no doubt the final racket and colourscheme will be revealed before then. Should you try this racket?

Here&#;s some reasons why you should give the New Head Radical a go.

The new Head Radical MP is a seriously precise frame for players looking for great accuracy on groundstrokes.

Baseliners who need some control will find loads with the Radical.

The racket I trialled was only a demo but does it look awesome? Like seriously is there a better looking racket than this prototype colour scheme? Here&#;s hoping that Head continue head graphene radical s tennis racquet review Grey and Orange colour scheme when the racket reaches the shops.

As a Head Radical fan this frame continues the legend. 

Colourway UPDATE

Head have now revealed the Radical Colours

Like this:

LikeLoading

Related Posts

Tags: Head RadicalHead Radical racket review, Head Radical new

Источник: [casinoextra.fr]
head graphene radical s tennis racquet review

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *